Exploring Consciousness-Raising of a Genre-Based Pedagogy through Virtual Reality for Academic Writing Development in Iranian EFL Context

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. Candidate in Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

This study innovatively reports on the use of a genre teaching course through virtual reality (VR) to enhance the writing proficiency of six Iranian EFL writers. The teaching and learning process was carried out in a cycle included setting the context, modeling, joint construction, independent construction, and comparing the texts. Notably, at the second stage of the cycle, virtual reality was capitalized for the deconstruction of the culture-bound conventions of the genre of information report as the focus of the study. Data were collected through learners’ pre-test and post-test writing samples, semi-structured interviews, and experts’ feedback. A genre analysis framework of the Sydney genre school was applied to examine the macro-level features, while micro-level analysis focused on lexical density and nominalization using principles from systemic functional linguistics (SFL). Findings reveal that VR-enhanced genre pedagogy significantly raised learners’ awareness of macro-structural and micro-linguistic features, yielding more coherent and informationally dense texts. The study demonstrates VR’s potential as a consciousness-raising tool in genre-based EAP instruction, offering practical implications for curriculum designers and educators seeking to integrate technologically enriched, culturally informed writing pedagogy.

Keywords

References

Allen, H. W., & Paesani, K. (2022). Genre instruction, textual borrowing, and foreign language writing: Graduate teaching assistant perspectives and practices. Language Teaching Research, 26(4), 755-776. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820911194
Almacıoğlu, G., & Okan, Z. (2018). Genre-based approach to writing instruction for students at an English language and literature department. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.460635
Beigi, S., & Ahmadi, H. (2011). A contrastive comparison of structural and rhetorical patterns of Persian and English argumentative essays. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 167-178.
Bruce, I. (2013). A role for genre-based pedagogy in academic writing instruction?: An EAP perspective. TEXT Special Issue, (21), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.28377
Burns, A. (2009). Teaching speaking using genre-based pedagogy. In National Centre for Swedish as a Second Language, University of Stockholm (Ed.), Symposium 2009 (pp. 230–246). University of Stockholm.
Burns, A. (2010). Genre-based approaches to writing and beginning adult ESL learners. Prospect, 5(3), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500000876
Burns, A., Joyce, H., & Gollin, S. (1996). ‘I see what you mean’: Using spoken discourse in the classroom: A handbook for teachers. National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
Chen, J., Dai, J., Zhu, K., & Xu, L. (2022). Effects of extended reality on language learning: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016519
Christie, F. (1999). Genre theory and ESL teaching: A systemic functional perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 759-763. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587717
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. Continuum International Publishing Group. Continuum.
Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. Continuum.
Dalton, G., & Devitt, A. (2016). Irish in a 3D world: Engaging primary school children. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 21–33. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/176112/.
Daly, A., & Unsworth, L. (2011). Analysis and comprehension of multimodal texts. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03651846
Dashtestani, R., & Stojkovic, N. (2016). The use of technology in English for specific purposes (ESP) instruction: A literature review. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 3(3), 435-456. https://espeap.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/espeap/article/view/304
Derewianka, B. (1991). Exploring how texts work. Primary English Teaching Association. Australia.
Derewianka, B. (1999). A functional model of language. Board of study New South Wales
Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal, 34(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400202
Derewianka, B. (2020). Exploring how texts work. Primary English Teaching Association. Australia.
Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2016). Teaching language in context. Oxford University Press, USA.
Estaji, M. (2024). English for specific purposes: Concepts, applications, and future directions. ATU Press. https://book.atu.ac.ir/book_856.html
Fernandez, M. J. (2017). Augmented-Virtual Reality: How to improve education systems. Higher Learning Research Communications, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v7i1.373
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 91-102). Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1st ed.). Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Context of situation. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (pp. 3-15). Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 185-235). Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: a language based approach to cognition. Cassel
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Herazo, J. D. (2012). Using a genre-based approach to promote oral communication in the Colombian English classroom. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(2), 109-126. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=s0123-46412012000200008&script=sci_abstract
Huang, Y., & Jun Zhang, L. (2020). Does a process-genre approach help improve students’ argumentative writing in English as a foreign language? Findings from an intervention study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 339-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1649223
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Hyon, S. (2017). Introducing genre and English for specific purposes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761152
Jodairi Pineh, A. (2017). Moving against the grain: Exploring genre-based pedagogy in a new context. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 136-158. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2017.13095
Jodairi Pineh, A. (2022). Exploring nominalization use in EFL students’ argumentative writing over a genre-based teaching and learning approach. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2022.17429
Jodairi Pineh, A., Beheshti Nezhad, S. F., & Khosravi, R. (2017). Exploring impacts of consciousness-raising in a genre-based pedagogy. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language, Discourse and Pragmatics), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2017.12868
Johns, A. M. (2011). The future of genre in L2 writing: Fundamental, but contested, instructional decisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 56-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.003
Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. UNSW Press.
Kress, G. (1999). Genre and the changing contexts for English language arts. Language Arts, 76(6), 461-485. https://doi.org/10.58680/la199954
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813850
Li, Y. (2022). Method to improve English writing skills: Virtual reality. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v2i.772
Lin, T. J., & Lan, Y. J. (2015). Language learning in virtual reality environments: past, present, and future. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 486–497. http://www.ifets.info/journals/18_4/37.pdf
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual reality in education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832
Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, register, and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children writing: Reader (pp. 21-30). Deakin University Press.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59
Martin, J. R. (1993). Life as a noun. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 221-268). Falmer.
Martin, J. R. (1994). Macro-genres: The ecology of the page. Network, 21, 29-60.
Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.002
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2005). Designing literacy pedagogy: Scaffolding democracy in the classroom. In R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, & J. Webster (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language (pp. 251-280). Equinox. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781845535803-011
Mickan, P. (2013). Social semiotics and academic literacies: An epistemological approach to the study of disciplinary discourses. International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 65.
Miller, D., & Dousay, T. (2015). Implementing augmented reality in the classroom. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 3(2). University of Arizona Libraries. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781845535803-011
Negretti, R. (2021). Searching for metacognitive generalities: Areas of convergence in learning to write for publication across doctoral students in science and engineering. Written Communication, 38(2), 167-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320984796
Negretti, R. (2021). Searching for Metacognitive Generalities: areas of convergence in learning to write for publication across doctoral students in science and engineering. Written Communication, 38(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320984796
Negretti, R., & Kuteeva, M. (2011). Fostering metacognitive genre awareness in L2 academic reading and writing: A case study of pre-service English teachers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.002
Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002
Pack, A., Barrett, X., Liang, H.-N., & Monteiro, D. V. (2020). University EAP students’ perceptions of using a prototype virtual reality learning environment to learn writing structure. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 27–48.
Poonpon, K., Satthamnuwong, B., & Sameephet, B. (2022). The effectiveness of task-based and genre-based integrated learning on English language proficiency of Thai rural secondary school students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(9), 1736-1747.
Ravelli, L. J. (1999). Metaphor, mode, and complexity: An exploration of covarying patterns. BA. Honours thesis, University of Sydney, Department of English and Media Studies.
Rose, D. (2001). Genre as purpose. In L. Verhoeven & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Literacy and motivation: Reading engagement in individuals and groups (pp. 85–104). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan & Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86-123). Longman.
Rothery, J. (1996). The teaching of writing in primary schools: Could do better. In G. Dudley-Evans & M. Joannou (Eds.), Writing an English language handbook (pp. 67-82). Routledge.
Sherman, W. R., & Craig, A. B. (2003). Understanding Virtual Reality—Interface, application, and design. PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality, 12(4), 441–442. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322391668
Southgate, E. (2020). Virtual reality in curriculum and pedagogy: Evidence from secondary classrooms (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291982
Tan, A., Cotos, E., & Dorneich, M. C. (2023). Genre-based L2 research writing: SLA-CALL interfaces for designing interactive virtual reality environments. In M. Peterson & N. Jabbari (Eds.), Frontiers in Computer Assisted Language Learning (pp. 7–25). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003395218-2
To, V., Fan, S., & Thomas, D. P. (2013). Lexical density and readability: A case study of English textbooks. The International Journal of Language, Society and Culture, 37(7), 61-71. https://hdl.handle.net/102.100.100/579058
Ure, J. (1971). Lexical density and register differentiation. In G. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trimm (Eds.), Applications of linguistics: Selected papers of the 2nd international congress of applied linguists (pp. 443-452). Cambridge University Press.
White, P. R., Mammone, G., & Caldwell, D. (2015). Linguistically based inequality, multilingual education and a genre-based literacy development pedagogy: Insights from the Australian experience. Language and Education, 29(3), 256-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.992496
Xing, M., Wang, J., & Spencer, K. (2008). Raising students’ awareness of cross-cultural contrastive rhetoric in English writing via an e-learning course. Language Learning and Technology, 12(2), 71-93. http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num2/xingetal/
Zhai, X., & Razali, A. B. (2023). Triple method approach to development of a genre-based approach to teaching ESL/EFL writing: A systematic literature review by bibliometric, content, and scientometric analyses. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221147255
Applied Linguistics Inquiry
Volume 4, Issue 1
March 2026
Pages 72-87

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 January 2025
  • Revise Date: 15 August 2025
  • Accept Date: 16 September 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics