Examining Strategies and Supportive Moves in Requestive Speech Acts: A Comparative Study of 'Top Notch' and 'Summit' English Series

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of Applied Humanities, Kashmar Higher Education Institute, Kashmar, Iran

2 Ph.D. Candidate in Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

10.22077/ali.2025.8527.1055

Abstract

This study investigated the discourse features of requestive speech acts in 10 textbooks from the Top Notch and Summit series to assess their potential for developing learners' pragmatic competence. Requests were analyzed in terms of directness strategies, head acts, and supportive discourse moves, drawing on the frameworks of Blum-Kulka et al. (1989) and Farch and Kasper (1989). The findings revealed a bias towards direct request strategies in both series, likely influenced by their utilitarian discourse structure. While Top Notch provided a wider range of directness levels, Summit, designed for advanced learners, offered limited exposure to diverse request strategies. Internal supportive moves, particularly the use of questions, were more prevalent than external moves in both series. These findings suggest that while the series contribute to language learning, they may not fully equip learners with the pragmatic competence necessary for effective intercultural communication. Further research is needed to explore the impact of explicit instruction and implicit learning on the acquisition of request strategies.

Keywords

References

Ahmadi Safa, M., Moradi, M., & Hamzavi, R. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers and learners perspective on potentiality of Top Notch series for intercultural competence development.  Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 3 (2), 47-66.  
Akbari Kelishadi, A., & Sharifzadeh, A. (2013). An evaluation of Top Notch series. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4 (4), 60-73.
Askaripour, S. A. A. (2014). A textbook evaluation of new version (2nd edition) of "Top Notch English series. English for Specific Purposes World, 15 (44), 1-30.
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words.  In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), the discourse reader (pp. 63-75). New York: Routledge.
Bataineh, R. F., Al-Qeyam, F. R., & Smadi, O. M. (2017). Does form-focused instruction really make a difference? Potential effectiveness in Jordanian EFL learners’ linguistic and pragmatic knowledge acquisition. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0040-0
Blum-Kulka, S. (1991). Interlanguage Pragmatics: The Case of Requests. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Salinker, M. Sharwood Smith & M. Swain (eds.), foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 255–272). Clevedon and Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: An introductory overview. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies, 31, 1-34.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
Boxer, D., & Pickering, L. (1995). Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.1.44
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christison, M. (2018). Speech act theory and teaching speaking. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0712
Darong, H. C. (2024, June). Teaching speech acts in EFL context. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1423498). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1423498
Farangi, M. R., & Khojastemehr, M. (2024). Iranian applied linguists (mis) conceptions of ethical issues in research: a mixed-methods study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 22(2), 359-376.
Farangi, M. R., & Naami, A. (2024). A study of early multilingualism in Iran: The effects of mother tongue literacy, socio-economic status and foreground TV exposure. Acta Psychologica, 243, 104167.
Farangi, M. R., & Nejadghanbar, H. (2024). Investigating questionable research practices among Iranian applied linguists: Prevalence, severity, and the role of artificial intelligence tools. System, 125, 103427.
Farangi, M. R., Rashidi, N., & Sanjarani, A. (2024). A Functional Analysis of EFL Classroom Talk: The Case of Experience. MEXTESOL Journal, 48(1), n1.
Farangi, M., & Zabbah, I. (2023). Intelligent scoring in an English reading comprehension course using artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy systems. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 42(4), 1-21.
Farch, C., & Kasper, G. (1989). Internal and external modification in interlanguage request
Homayounzadeh, M., & Sahragard, R. (2015). An Intercultural Approach to Textbook Evaluation: A Case of Top Notch and Summit Series. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4 (1), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.1p.198
Kafi, Z., Ashraf, H., & Motallebzadeh, K. (2013). English textbooks and cultural attitudes of Iranian EFL learners: investigating a relationship. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4 (2), 25-36.
Kawashima, C. (2022). Learners’ Opportunities to Practice Speech Acts in English Language Teaching Textbooks. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTPCP2021-03
Pramono, S. A., & Kurniawan, E. (2020). a Micro Analysis Study of Pragmatic Content in Indonesian Elt Textbooks. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 9(1), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.31571/bahasa.v9i1.1673
Pérez-Hernández, L. (2019). From Research to the Textbook: Assessing Speech Acts Representation in Course Book Series for Students of English as an L2. Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 248–276. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.17024.per
Pérez-Hernández, L. (2020). Speech Acts in English: From Research to Instruction and Textbook Development. Cambridge University Press.
Rashidi, N., & Meihami, H. (2016). Hidden curriculum: An analysis of cultural content of the ELT textbooks in inner, outer, and expanding circle countries. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1212455. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1212455
Rattanawong, A., & Thongrin, S. (2022). An evaluation of cultural contents in ELT textbooks used by university students in Thailand and development of an ELT textbook redesigned under EIL paradigm (No. 308286). Thammasat University.
Ren, W., & Han, Z. (2016). The Representation of Pragmatic Knowledge in Recent ELT Textbooks. ELT Jour-nal, 70(4), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw010
Sarbandi, F. R., Taki, G., Yousefian, P., & Farangi, M. R. (2017). The effect of physicians’ gender and experience on Persian medical interactions. Discourse and Interaction, 10(1), 89-110.
Saslow, J. M., Ascher, A., & Rouse, J. C. (2011). Top notch. Second edition. Pearson Longman.                   
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soozandefar, S. M. A., & Sahragard, R. (2011).   A Textbook Evaluation of Speech Acts and Language Functions in Top-Notch Series. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1 (12), 1831-1838.
Tavakol, M., & Sayadian, S. (2014). An evaluation of Top Notch fundamental A and B. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3 (2), 101-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2013.411
Ton Nu, A. T., & Murray, J. (2020). Pragmatic Content in EFL Textbooks: An Investigation into Vietnamese National Teaching Materials. TESL-EJ, 24(3), 1–28
Wilson, L. D. (2023). Investigating the coverage of speech acts in Hong Kong ELT textbooks. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.56040/lmdw2014
Zhang, X., & Su, X. (2021). A cross-national analysis of cultural representations in English textbooks used in China and Germany. SN Social Sciences, 1(4), 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00088-8
Applied Linguistics Inquiry
Volume 3, Issue 1
March 2025
Pages 121-132

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 December 2024
  • Revise Date: 28 February 2025
  • Accept Date: 13 January 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics