Exploring the Perceptions of EFL Teachers on the Implementation of Critical Dialogue in Language Education: An Ethnographic Grounded Theory Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran / Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

2 Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

3 M.A. in Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

Abstract

Critical pedagogy places a significant emphasis on dialogue due to its transformative potential within educational settings. This approach fosters critical thinking, self-reflection, and empowerment among students, encouraging them to engage deeply with the material and question underlying assumptions. While research in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts has delved into the application of critical dialogue, there has been a notable gap in understanding how teachers perceive and implement this approach in their classrooms. This study seeks to address this gap by collecting data through ethnographic interviews with 22 teachers over three months. Data analysis was then conducted using a constructivist grounded theory methodology. Results showed that for critical dialogic teaching to be effective, two essential conditions should be met: (1) the presence of a critical dialogical teacher who embodies characteristics such as openness, mediation, and the ability to create a supportive environment, and (2) the use of specific strategies, such as authentic tasks, group work, and technology, to foster engagement and diverse perspectives. These findings have significant implications for language education, highlighting the need for teacher training that supports the development of dialogical teaching practices, promotes inclusive classroom environments, and empowers students to engage critically with both language and content. The study also underscores the importance of addressing the cultural and contextual factors that influence how critical dialogue is perceived and implemented by teachers in EFL settings.

Keywords

References

Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2020). Collaborative dialogue: Opportunities and challenges in vocabulary acquisition and retention of threshold EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(2), 133-160. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0175
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483. https://doi.org/10.2307/328585
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.; M. Holquist, Ed.). University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown University Press.
Bohm, D. (2004). On dialogue. Routledge.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444803001903
Bouali, A. (2021). ‘Bloometizing’ the EFL literature classroom through a dialogic model: A barometer for academic change. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 12. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no3.13
Bozorgian, H., & Alamdari, E. F. (2018). Multimedia listening comprehension: Metacognitive instruction or metacognitive instruction through dialogic interaction. ReCALL, 30(1), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000240
Brookfield, S. D. (2004). The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching: A course in second language acquisition. Pearson.
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2016). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1162-1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.964263
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2013). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Heinle ELT.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Chick, N. L., Haynie, A., & Gurung, R. (2012). Exploring more signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of the mind. Routledge.
Collie, J., & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the language classroom: A resource book of ideas and activities. Cambridge University Press.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Crookes, G., & Lehner, A. (1998). Aspects of process in an ESL critical pedagogy teacher education course. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587586
Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809103446
Cui, R., & Teo, P. (2024). Dialogic instruction in a Chinese EFL classroom: A practitioner perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 114-137. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3215
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan Publishing.
Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002
Dobao, A. F. (2016). Peer interaction and learning. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 33-61). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.02fer
Dongyu, Z., Fanyu, B., & Wanyi, D. (2013). Sociocultural theory applied to second language learning: Collaborative learning with reference to the Chinese context. International Education Studies, 6(9), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n9p165
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1-23.
Fetterman, D. M. (2019). Ethnography: Step-by-step. Sage publications.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Continuum.
Giroux, H. A. (2007). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. Routledge.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
Gobo, G. (2008). Doing ethnography. Sage Publications.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
Hashemnezhad, H. (2020). Applying Freire’s critical pedagogy to Iranian EFL bilingual and monolingual speaking performance. Journal of Language and Education, 6(4), 90-104. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10349
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hockly, N., & Clandfield, L. (2010). Teaching online: Tools and techniques, options and opportunities. Delta Publishing Stuttgart.
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
hooks, b. (2010). Teaching critical thinking: Practical wisdom. Routledge.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge University Press.
Jocuns, K. F. (2021). Dialogic teaching as a way to promote students’ English language use in EFL classroom. PASAA, 62, 173-203.
Johnson, D. (2012). Reaching out: Interpersonal effectiveness and self-actualization. Pearson.
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.
Kaufmann, J. J. (2010). The practice of dialogue in critical pedagogy. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(5), 456-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713610363021
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086288
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Routledge.
Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-54). Multilingual Matters.
Miller, C. H. (2019). Digital storytelling: A creator’s guide to interactive entertainment. Routledge.
Moreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative stategies for teaching reading comprehension. American Library Association.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. American Psychological Association.
Richards, J. C., & Burns, A. (2012). The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Scotland, J. (2022). Exploring the relationship between collaborative dialogue and the learning of L2 form. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100121
Shin, H., & Crookes, G. (2005). Exploring the possibilities for EFL critical pedagogy in Korea: A two-part case study. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies: An International Journal, 2(2), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427595cils0202_3
Spack, R. (1985). Literature, reading, writing, and ESL: Bridging the gaps. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 703-725. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586672
Spradley, J. P. (2016). The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press.
Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 268-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12088
Sybing, R. (2023). Dialogic validation: A discourse analysis for conceptual development within dialogic classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 14(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2022.2079693
Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (2016). Collaborative dialogue in learning pragmatics: Pragmatic-related episodes as an opportunity for learning request-making. Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 416-437. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu039
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2007). Advancing ethnographic research through grounded theory practice. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 493-512). Sage Publications.
Tsui, A. B. (2001). Classroom interaction. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 120-125). Cambridge University Press.
Walker, D. (2018). ‘Getting our spirits out’, letting youth spirits and life worlds into the classroom through youth radio arts for transnational students. Ethnography and Education, 13(3), 286-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2018.1441042
Wertsch, J. V. (2006). Generalized collective dialogue and advanced foreign language capacities. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 58-71). Continuum.
Witherspoon, M., Sykes, G., & Bell, C. (2016). Leading a classroom discussion: Definition, supportive evidence, and measurement of the ETS® National Observational Teaching Examination (NOTE) assessment series. Educational Testing Service.
Applied Linguistics Inquiry
Volume 2, Issue 2
September 2024
Pages 34-46

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 April 2024
  • Revise Date: 15 June 2024
  • Accept Date: 09 August 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics