Computerized Dynamic Assessment of Incidental Vocabulary Learning: A Case of Iranian ESP Learners

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Bu-Ali Sina University

2 Zanjan University

Abstract

Dynamic assessment (DA) has been widely researched in different linguistic areas, but there is paucity of research on its incorporation into English for Specific Purposes (ESP). Accordingly, this study investigates the effectiveness of DA on incidental vocabularies emerging in technical reading textbooks with a focus on electronic engineering students. The research method is a quasi-experimental research design focusing on an intact group of 25 Bachelor of Science students of electronics from the University of Zanjan, Iran. The instruments used are Preliminary English Test (PET), a vocabulary knowledge scale, and a mediation test (a 13-item multiple-choice test). The mediation test was delivered through the researcher-developed website, designed for this purpose. As a triangulation, participants’ evaluation of computerized dynamic assessment (CDA), too, was elicited using a survey adopted from Nirmalakhandan (2007). The results of the qualitative and quantitative phases indicated that Electronic students’ incidental vocabulary learning promoted dramatically using target CDA, employing structured prompts for the mediation process. The results of this study can inform both teachers and learners by providing a step by step procedure for both teaching and assessment of ESP learners' vocabulary.

Keywords


Ajideh, P., & Nourdad, N. (2013). Dynamic assessment revealing individual differences in EFL reading comprehension ability. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educations, 3(2), 340-350.
Alibakhshi, G., Ghand Ali, H., & Padiz, D. (2011). Teaching and Testing ESP at Iranian Universities: A Critical View. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6), 1346-1352.
Anthony, L. (1998). Defining English for specific purposes and the role of the ESP practitioner. Center for Language Research 1997 Annual Review, 115-120.
Bogdanov, S. (2013). One-time treatment for incidental vocabulary learning: Call for discontinuation. Teaching English with Technology, 13(2), 75-82.
Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 273–305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 136-163.
Budoff, M. (1968). Learning potential as a supplementary testing procedure. In J. Hellmuth (ed.) Learning Disorders. Vol. 3. Seattle, WA: Special Child.
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1990). Guided learning and transfer: Implications for approaches to assessment. In N. Frederikson, R. Glaser, A. Lesgold, & M. G. Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp. 141–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ebadi, S., & Saeedian, A. (2015). The Effects of Computerized Dynamic Assessment on Promoting At-Risk Advanced Iranian EFL Students’ Reading Skills. Issues in Language Teaching, 4(2), 26-1. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2015.7224
Estaji, M. & Ameri. A.H. (2020). Dynamic assessment and its impact on pre-intermediate and high-intermediate EFL learners’ grammar achievement. Cogent Education, 7:1, 1740040, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1740040
Haghani, M. (2013). English for the students of Power, Electronics, Control & Communications. Tehran: SAMT.
Hessamy, GH. & Ghaderi, E. (2014). The role of dynamic assessment in vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 645-652.
Hidri, S. (2014). Developing and evaluating a dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in an EFL context. Language Testing in Asia, 4(4).
Hill, M., & Laufer, B. (2003). Type task, time-on-task and electronic dictionaries in incidental vocabulary acquisition. IRAL, 41, 87-106.
Hutchison, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khomijani Farahani, A. & Mirzaei, Gh.R. (2019). Investigating the Effect of Dynamic Assessment on Learning Congruent and Non-Congruent Collocations by Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 9(3), 789-814.
Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at-risk students. School Psychology International, 23, 112-127.
Lantolf J. P., & Poehner M. E. (Eds.). (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 49-72.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laufer, B. (2006). Comparing Focus on Form and Focus on Forms in Second-Language Vocabulary Learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1):149.
Lidz, C. S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S. & Miller, S. M. (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 99–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mardani, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). Beyond reading comprehension: The effect of adding a dynamic assessment component on EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 688-696.
Moslemi, F., Moinzadeh, A., & Dabaghi, A. (2011). ESP needs analysis of Iranian MA students: A case study of the University of Isfahan. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 4(4), 121-129.
MovahedFar, S., Abbasian, G., & Ameri, A. (2022). Computer-Based Dynamic Assessment of EFL Learners’ Writing Performance: Evidence from Both Cognitive and Emotive Domains. Journal of Language and Translation, 12(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.30495/ttlt.2022.692048
Nirmalakhandan N. (2007). Computerized adaptive tutorials to improve and assess problem-solving skills. Computers & Education, 49 (4), 1321-1329
Nito,  R.  (2004). Vocabulary &  ESP:  Teaching Business  Vocabulary.  Retrieved  25th  October  2011, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/46984761/ESP
Orikasa, M. (2010). Interactionist dynamic assessment in L2 learning: A case study of tutoring L2 English oral communication. Retrieved from http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/20258
Paribakht, T. & Wesche, M. (1999). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition: Theory, current research and instructional implications. Thematic Issue: Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2).
Pishghadam, R., Barabadi, E., & Mehri Kamrood, A. (2011). The differing effect of computerized dynamic assessment of L2 reading comprehension on high and low achievers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6), 1353-1358.
Poehner, M.E., & Lantolf J.P. (2021). The ZPD, Second Language Learning, and the Transposition ~ Transformation Dialectic. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(3), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170306
Poehner, M. E. & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized Dynamic Assessment. Language Teaching Research 17(3): 323-342.
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. New York: Springer.
Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment (CDA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Journal of Language Testing. 32(3), 337-357. [Downloaded from ltj.sagepub.com at Hacettepe University on June 28, 2015]
Qingha, L., & Di, L. (2015). A review of empirical studies in L2 dynamic assessment. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 55-73.
Saeidi, M., & Hosseinpour, A. (2013). The effect of dynamic assessment as an instructional tool on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research. 3(10), 421-429.
Sarani, A., & Sahebi, L. (2012). The impact of task-based approach on vocabulary learning in ESP courses. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 5(10), 118-128.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Summers, R. (2008). Dynamic assessment: Towards a model of dialogic engagement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of South Florida, Tampa.
Swales, J. (1988). Episodes in ESP. Prentice Hall.
Tang, C. & Treffers-Daller, J. (2016). Assessing incidental vocabulary learning by Chinese EFL learners: a test of the Involvement Load Hypothesis. In: Yu, G. & Jin, Y. (eds.). Assessing Chinese learners of English: language constructs, consequences and conundrums. Palgrave, London, pp. 121149. ISBN 9781137449771. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449788. Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/39023/
Tangpijaikul, M. (2014). Preparing business vocabulary for the ESP classroom. Regional Language Centre Journal, 45(1), 51- 65.
Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York: Plenum Publishers.
Vafaee, P. (2011). Dynamic assessment: A dialectical integration of assessment and instruction. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 63-66.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y. H. (2013). Incidental vocabulary learning through extensive reading: A case of lower level EFL Taiwanese learners. The Journal of ASLA TEFL, 10(3), 59-80.
Xi, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2021). Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260
Zangoei, A., Zareian, G., Adel, S.A.M., & Amirian, S.A.M. (2019). The impact of computerized dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL learners' interlanguage pragmatic development. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 6(4), 139-165. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2019.11536.1433